These notes are a summary of concepts in “Why Do They Refuse to Use My Robot?: Reasons for Non- Use Derived from a Long-Term Home Study.”
Maartje de Graaf, Somaya Ben Allouch, and Jan van Dijk. 2017. Why Do They Refuse to Use My Robot? Reasons for Non-Use Derived from a Long-Term Home Study. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020236
- User Engagement Strategies
- Usefulness and ease of use
- Provide practical and intuitive solutions to immediate needs
- Adaptability and intelligence
- Personalize interactions based on user behavior
- Enjoyment and attractiveness
- Ensure engaging and visually appealing designs
- Social presence and sociability
- Incorporate elements that mimic human interaction
- Trust and status
- Build credibility and align with user aspirations
- Gratifications beyond smartphones
- Offer unique features unavailable on mobile devices
- Companionship and animacy
- Develop socially supportive functionalities
- Addressing anxiety and innovativeness
- Minimize user apprehensions and encourage exploration
- Self-efficacy and adaptability
- Empower users to leverage system capabilities effectively
- Sustained novelty and motivation
- Regular updates and fresh experiences
- Usefulness and ease of use
- Countering Disenchantment and Discontinuance
- Common reasons for disenchantment
- Over-intelligence
- Lack of fun
- Poor interaction design
- Restrictions and problems
- Address technical barriers, e.g., connectivity and usability.
- Needs not satisfied: Enhance functionality to meet unmet user needs
- Replacement by other devices: Provide distinct value over existing technologies
- End of novelty
- Keep users engaged with innovative updates
- Addressing specific concerns
- Language barriers
- Privacy concerns
- Uncanny valley in robot behavior
- Common reasons for disenchantment
- User perceptions in social contexts
- Robot as a tool
- Align user expectations with task-oriented capabilities
- Social influence and norms
- peer recommendations and societal acceptance
- Impact of attitudes and prior expectations
- Manage expectations to avoid disappointment
- Robot as a tool
- Addressing Limitations of Current Intelligent Systems
- Simplistic interactions
- Enhance with richer social and functional behaviors
- Mismatch in expectations
- Reduce gaps between anticipated and actual performance
- Technical barriers
- Improve accessibility and operational reliability
- Personalization challenges
- Increase system adaptability to varied user preferences
- Simplistic interactions
- Research opportunities
- Expectation-Confirmation Model and Theory of Planned Behavior
- Understand the gap between initial adoption and continued use
- Investigate belief structures impacting long-term engagement
- Defining “long-term”
- Explore duration differences across technologies
- Examine how novelty and familiarization phases affect usage
- User skills and digital divides
- Assess the required digital competencies for effective robot use
- Address societal inequalities in access and familiarity with technology
- Expectation-Confirmation Model and Theory of Planned Behavior
- Design Implications
- Human-centric design
- Focus on user needs, preferences, and behaviors
- Incremental autonomy
- Allow users to adjust intelligent behavior gradually
- Targeted functionality
- Develop features that solve specific, unmet user problems
- Interactive feedback
- Provide real-time responses to user inputs to build trust
- Human-centric design